Case Overview

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Cases Covered: 5

Total Value: $256.3M+ (settlements) + $3.7B (sought)

Updated: May 2026

Topics: AI Advertising, Earthquake Liability, Social Media, Harm, Data Privacy, Unsolicited Texts

5 Class Action Lawsuits and Settlements Making Headlines This Week

From a landmark $250 million resolution over allegedly overhyped iPhone AI features to a state attorney general seeking $3.7 billion from Meta, this week brought a wave of significant legal developments across tech, energy, and data privacy. According to recent reporting from Top Class Actions, Apple's proposed settlement alone represents one of the larger consumer class action resolutions involving artificial intelligence marketing claims. Here's a look at five cases worth knowing about.

1. Apple — $250M Settlement Over iPhone AI Feature Claims

Settlement Amount: $250 million (proposed)

Status: Proposed settlement; pending court approval

Who May Qualify: Consumers who purchased certain iPhone models that were marketed with AI features

Apple has agreed to a proposed $250 million class action settlement to resolve allegations that the company falsely advertised artificial intelligence capabilities on certain iPhone models. The lawsuit alleges that Apple promoted AI-driven features that were either unavailable at launch or did not perform as advertised, leading consumers to purchase devices based on representations that the plaintiffs claim were misleading.

According to the complaint, class members say they paid a premium for iPhones specifically because of the touted AI functionality — and that, had they known the features would not be delivered as described, they would not have made the purchase or would have paid significantly less.

The settlement, if approved by a court, could provide compensation to eligible iPhone buyers, though individual payout amounts would depend on the number of valid claims filed.

How to claim: Monitor the settlement administrator's website for claim form details once the court grants preliminary approval.

2. Freedom Energy & Partners — $2.6M Oklahoma Earthquake Settlement

Settlement Amount: $2.6 million

Status: Proposed settlement

Who May Qualify: Oklahoma residents and property owners who experienced earthquake damage allegedly linked to wastewater disposal well operations

Freedom Energy, Montclair, New Dominion, and HP have agreed to a proposed $2.6 million class action settlement to resolve claims that their wastewater disposal well operations contributed to a series of earthquakes in Oklahoma. The lawsuit alleges that the companies' disposal practices — which involve injecting wastewater deep underground — triggered seismic activity that caused property damage and related harm to area residents.

Scientific research has suggested a link between high-volume wastewater injection and induced seismicity, and Oklahoma experienced a significant uptick in earthquake frequency during the peak years of such operations in the state. The complaint alleges the companies were aware of the potential risks and continued operations regardless.

Settlement details, including eligibility requirements and proof of damage documentation, are expected to be finalized pending court approval.

How to claim: Check court filings and the settlement administrator's website for claim instructions as the case progresses.

3. Meta — New Mexico AG Seeks $3.7 Billion Over Social Media 'Public Nuisance' Claims

Amount Sought: Approximately $3.7 billion

Status: Active litigation; no settlement reached

Who May Be Affected: New Mexico residents, particularly minors allegedly harmed by Meta's platforms

New Mexico's attorney general has asked a state court to order Meta to pay approximately $3.7 billion, alleging that the company's social media platforms — including Facebook and Instagram — constitute a "public nuisance" that has caused widespread harm to residents, particularly children and adolescents.

The state's complaint alleges that Meta designed its platforms with features intended to maximize engagement and time on site, with the lawsuit claiming these design choices contributed to mental health harms, exposure to harmful content, and other damage to New Mexico's population. The attorney general argues that the scale and systemic nature of the alleged harm meets the legal threshold for a public nuisance claim under state law.

Meta has not publicly agreed to the allegations. This case is one of a growing number of state-level legal actions targeting social media companies over their alleged role in youth mental health outcomes.

What's next: The case remains in active litigation. No trial date has been announced.

4. MoneyLion — Class Action Alleges Unsolicited Referral Texts Violated Washington Law

Status: Newly filed lawsuit

Who May Qualify: Washington state residents who allegedly received unsolicited referral text messages from MoneyLion

A newly filed class action lawsuit alleges that MoneyLion, a financial technology company, violated Washington state law by sending unsolicited text messages to consumers without their prior consent. According to the complaint, the messages were referral-related communications — texts encouraging recipients to sign up for MoneyLion's services — sent to individuals who had not opted in to receive such contact.

The lawsuit alleges violations of Washington's consumer protection statutes governing unsolicited commercial messaging. If certified as a class action, the case could cover a broad group of Washington residents who received similar texts during the relevant period.

MoneyLion has not publicly responded to the allegations at this time.

How to claim: The lawsuit is in early stages. Consumers who believe they received unsolicited texts from MoneyLion in Washington may want to consult with a qualified attorney to understand their options.

5. Kochava — FTC Settlement Resolves Geolocation Data Sale Allegations

Status: Settlement reached with the FTC

Who May Be Affected: U.S. consumers whose precise geolocation data was allegedly sold without adequate consent

A settlement has been reached between the Federal Trade Commission and Kochava, an Idaho-based data broker, resolving a lawsuit that alleged the company sold consumers' precise geolocation data in ways that could expose sensitive personal information. According to reporting from the HIPAA Journal, the FTC's complaint alleged that Kochava's data marketplace allowed buyers to track individuals' movements to and from sensitive locations, including medical facilities, places of worship, and domestic violence shelters.

The FTC's action alleged that selling this data posed significant privacy risks and constituted an unfair business practice under federal law. The terms of the settlement include requirements that Kochava delete certain historical data and establish a data privacy program, according to available reporting — though the settlement does not include a direct consumer compensation fund at this stage.

What's next: Consumers concerned about geolocation data privacy may wish to review the privacy settings on apps and devices they use regularly.

Key Takeaways

• AI marketing claims are increasingly actionable. Apple's proposed $250 million settlement signals that courts and litigants are scrutinizing whether tech companies can deliver on the AI features they advertise at sale.
• State attorneys general are expanding their playbook. New Mexico's $3.7 billion public nuisance theory against Meta reflects a broader trend of states pursuing large-scale tech accountability claims outside of traditional class action structures.
• Geolocation data remains a litigation flashpoint. The Kochava FTC settlement underscores ongoing regulatory concern about how data brokers collect and sell precise location information tied to sensitive personal behavior.
• Unsolicited texts continue to generate lawsuits. State-level consumer protection laws — particularly in Washington and California — carry real legal teeth for companies that message consumers without consent.
• Proof requirements vary widely. Some settlements, like earthquake damage claims, may require documentation of property harm; others, like text message cases, may only require records of receiving the communication.

Are you following any of these cases? Have you filed a claim in a class action settlement? Share your experience in the comments below.

InjuryClaims.com reports on litigation developments for informational purposes only. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice. Eligibility for any settlement or lawsuit is determined by attorneys and courts, not by this publication.